famous case laws in pakistan Secrets
famous case laws in pakistan Secrets
Blog Article
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only performed If your employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to generally be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Tiny fees use.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the uncovered counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession from the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Ordinarily, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (like People in very clear violation of established case regulation) on the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as the case will not be appealed, the decision will stand.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during here the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement from the laws, the legal system adheres on the doctrine of stare decisis
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may possibly exist conflicts between the different decreased appellate courts. Sometimes these differences will not be resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
Only the written opinions of your Supreme Court along with the Court of Appeals are routinely offered. Decisions of the decrease (trial) courts usually are not generally published or dispersed.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is usually a mandatory need and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law demands that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. Should the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety days for your department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision from the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar challenge. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in applying the law. This example of case regulation refers to two cases listened to inside the state court, within the same level.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” usually are not binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.